Over 200 publications, including the composite endpoints regulators now recognize. We publish our methodology in the open so reviewers meet it before your submission does.
Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) · 2024:Poster Tue-17 · Hendrix, Dickson et al.
Companies recently identified clinical study sites engaging in fraudulent practices, reducing success in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Successful trials are reliable…
When the sample size a conventional design demands is larger than the trial you can run, a Global Statistical Test lets the clinical-endpoint hypotheses be tested anyway. The paper sets out when GST applies, how it is pre-specified, and how it has been received in review.
2 publications
Sorted newest first
2006 · Presented as a poster exhibit at the 10th International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders, Madrid, Spain
2006 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: MPC–7869 (R–flurbiprofen) is a Selective Aβ42–Lowering Agent (SALA). In a mouse model of AD (Tg2576), MPC–7869 lowers brain levels of Aβ42 and chronic dosing in this model reduces brain amyloid pathology and prevents defects in learning and memory. These data suggest a potential for MPC–7869 to have disease–modifying properties. Objective(s): This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of treatment with MPC–7869 for 12 months in subjects with mild–to–moderate AD, and includes data from a 1–year follow–on study. Methods: This was a placebo–controlled, double–blind, 1–year trial evaluating 400 mg BID and 800 mg BID of MPC–7869 in 207 patients with mild–to–moderate AD (MMSE 15–26, with an average MMSE score of 21). The mean age of the subjects at baseline was 75 years and 94% of subjects were on stable acetylcholinesterase inhibitor therapy. Primary outcomes included measures of cognition (ADAS–cog), activities of daily living (ADCS–ADL), and global function (CDR–sb). A population pharmacokinetic analysis was also performed. At the end of this study, over 80% of eligible patients were enrolled into a 1–year follow–on treatment study in which placebo patients were randomized into one of the two treatment groups and treated patients continued their stable dose. Treatment groups remained blinded to patient/investigator. Results: A prespecified interaction analysis revealed that mild and moderate AD patients responded differently to MPC–7869 (P= 0.03). In mild AD patients (MMSE 20–26) taking the 800–mg BID dose, statistically significant benefit was observed at 12 months in activities of daily living with a treatment effect size of d=0.44 (P= 0.033) and global function with a treatment effect size of d=0.42 (P= 0.042) with a positive trend observed in cognition. In addition, there was a significant plasma drug concentration to response relationship (ADCS–ADL, P= 0.037 and CDR–sb, P= 0.019). No benefit was observed in moderate AD patients. MPC–7869 was well tolerated and patients taking the 800–mg BID dose continued to show benefit in the 1–year follow–on study. Conclusions: MPC–7869 has an attractive therapeutic and safety profile in patients with mild AD. This study justifies larger–scale confirmatory trials of MPC–7869 as an amyloid–based intervention strategy for AD treatment.
Loading more publications…
Looking for older work, or a specific methodology paper? Our research team can point you to the right reference.
Ask our team
