Over 200 publications, including the composite endpoints regulators now recognize. We publish our methodology in the open so reviewers meet it before your submission does.
Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) · 2024:Poster Tue-17 · Hendrix, Dickson et al.
Companies recently identified clinical study sites engaging in fraudulent practices, reducing success in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Successful trials are reliable…
When the sample size a conventional design demands is larger than the trial you can run, a Global Statistical Test lets the clinical-endpoint hypotheses be tested anyway. The paper sets out when GST applies, how it is pre-specified, and how it has been received in review.
Showing the 50 most recent
Sorted newest first
2026 · Stat Med.
Mallinckrodt, Craig · Dickson, Samuel · Hendrix, Suzanne
In progressive diseases such as Alzheimer's, treatments that slow progression should start early to preserve higher levels of functioning for a longer period. In corresponding clinical trials, treatment effects are usually expressed as mean differences on a clinical scale at fixed time points. Early in the disease course, however, these mean differences may appear small but may nonetheless correspond to an important slowing of disease progression. This complicates the appreciation of the relevance of observed treatment effects. We introduce a class of target parameters that quantify treatment effects on the time scale in longitudinal studies; for instance, in terms of time saved or percentage slowing of progression. We focus on data from randomized trials where the target parameters are identified under regularity assumptions. These target parameters remain well defined if treatment was not randomized, but additional untestable assumptions are required for identification. We propose general two-step estimators. In the first step, the data can be analyzed with standard methods for longitudinal data and standard software can thus be used. In the second step, summary statistics from the first step are used for inferences about the target parameters. The second step has been implemented in the TCT R package. We study the asymptotic properties and efficiency of these two-step estimators, and evaluate them in an extensive simulation study. These estimators are used in a phase 2/3 clinical trial for Alzheimer's disease, leading to important additional insights into the treatment effect.
2026 · Neurol Ther
Dickson, Samuel · Hendrix, Suzanne
Introduction: The spinocerebellar ataxia composite score (SCACOMS) comprises items from the functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) and the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C). In the derivation of SCACOMS, weights reflecting 1-year responsiveness were assigned to each item using partial least squares (PLS) regression modeling. The current objective was to incorporate patient-feedback into the SCACOMS item weights, examine corresponding responsiveness of the composite scale, and discuss potential implications for future use. Methods: Item weights derived by PLS regression were compared to each item's relative importance as assigned by 16 patients with SCA during semi-structured interviews. SCACOMS item weights were adjusted using the following combinations: (1) 50/50 weighted combination of PLS and patient weights and (2) reducing the weight of CGI-C to 20% and averaging individual item weights obtained from each perspective. The 1-year mean to standard deviation ratios (MSDRs) for the resulting reweighted scales were compared, with larger MSDRs indicating greatest sensitivity to disease progression. Results: The PLS-derived SCACOMS had the highest MSDR (0.99). When item weights were averaged across the two sources, the resulting MSDR was 0.91. When the weight of CGI-C was set to 20%, reflecting patient preferences for higher weights on the discrete symptoms, the MSDR was 0.79. Conclusions: This study took a novel approach to enhance the face validity of SCACOMS by incorporating patient feedback into the statistically optimized item weights. The result is the merging of objectively derived item weightings (reflecting optimal scale responsiveness) with patient-assigned relevance. While this update may increase the patient centricity of a composite measure, this comes at the expense of reduced sensitivity. This potential trade-off in sensitivity to detect change should be evaluated in the context of the composite measure's intended use.
2025 · CNS Drugs
Hendrix, Suzanne · Dickson, Samuel · Durrant, Abe
Amyloid-plaque reduction is currently the only recognized surrogate outcome for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) trials, allowing accelerated approval of plaque-clearing amyloid antibodies. However, plaque reduction does not facilitate the development of new non-plaque-clearing treatments. The hippocampus is among the first brain regions affected by AD pathology, exhibiting synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration that manifests as hippocampal atrophy and memory decline. We evaluated hippocampal volume (HV) as a potential surrogate outcome that can predict clinical benefit in disease-modification trials. Using published data from observational and interventional studies that examined both cognition and HV on volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (vMRI), we evaluated the cross-sectional correlations of HV to cognitive performance, the longitudinal correlations of HV atrophy to cognitive decline, HV sensitivity to drug effects, and the correlations between drug effects on HV atrophy and cognitive decline. We also examined the magnitude of HV protection that corresponds to meaningful clinical benefit. Analyses from 30 observational studies encompassing 13,187 individuals (2633 cognitively normal; 10,554 early AD) showed significant cross-sectional correlations between baseline HV and cognition, and longitudinal correlations between HV atrophy and cognitive decline over ≥ 1 year. The relationship of HV–cognitive drug effects was examined at the group level in nine placebo-controlled trials of five antiamyloid agents that evaluated HV in early AD trials of at least 18 months’ duration. These trials included four amyloid antibodies (aducanumab, lecanemab, donanemab, and gantenerumab) and one oral anti-oligomer agent (valiltramiprosate). Individual-level HV–cognition relationships were examined in two valiltramiprosate studies, one of which included diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) providing microstructural correlates of HV drug effects and helping distinguish neuroprotection from brain edema. Across these anti-amyloid drug trials (total N ~10,000), there was a linear relationship between drug effects on slowing of cognitive decline and slowing of HV atrophy. Two anti-oligomer trials (valiltramiprosate) reported significant subject-level correlations between drug effects on HV and cognition over 18–24 months (r = −0.40 to −0.44, p < 0.005, N = 50/69), with significant correlations of drug effects on brain microstructure (decreased mean diffusivity) with both HV and cognitive benefits, supporting reduced neurodegeneration. The minimal HV preservation at the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage that is associated with clinical benefit is estimated to be ≥ 40 mm3 or ≥ 10% of atrophy in the placebo arm over 18 months. Our findings demonstrate that hippocampal atrophy is an early indicator of cognitive decline in AD, linked to amyloid and tau-related neurodegeneration. HV on standardized vMRI is sensitive to anti-amyloid treatments, demonstrating strong correlations between slowed hippocampal atrophy and slowed cognitive decline. Data from over 23,000 subjects over three decades support HV as a surrogate marker for predicting clinical benefit in early symptomatic AD.
2025 · Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
Dickson, Samuel · O'Keefe, Patrick · Hendrix, Suzanne
Background: The measures used to assess Parkinson’s disease (PD) in clinical trials were developed for a broad spectrum of disease severity, limiting their ability to detect meaningful changes in early PD over a feasible study period. Objective: To develop PD composite scales (PARCOMS) using clinical trials data with increased responsiveness to clinical decline in patients with early untreated disease. Methods: Subjects from the placebo arms of clinical trials (Critical Path for Parkinson’s [CPP] dataset), diagnosed with PD within the previous two years, with no current or prior use of dopaminergic therapies were included. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was used to develop two composite scales: PARCOMS-Function using items from the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scales, and PARCOMS-Motor using items from MDS-UPDRS Parts II and III. Scale responsiveness was estimated using mean to standard deviation ratios (MSDRs) for change from baseline at 12-months. Results: The MSDR for PARCOMS-Function (n = 140) was 12.3 % higher vs MDS-UPDRS Part II alone and 339 % higher vs PDQ-39 alone. The MSDR for PARCOMS-Motor (n = 181) was 27.5 % higher vs the combined MDS- UPDRS Parts II and III. PARCOMS-Function retained 15-items (34.1 %) from Part II and PDQ-39. PARCOMS-motor retained 23-items (50.0 %) from Part II and III. Items that were not responsive to change or that were correlated with more responsive items were omitted. Conclusions: Clinical trial data were used to develop two PARCOMS scales which demonstrated greater sensitivity to disease progression in patients with early PD over 12-months compared to the original scales.
2025 · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Haaland, Benjamin · Dickson, Samuel · Christensen, Joshua · Mallinckrodt, Craig · Hendrix, Suzanne
Background The AFF006 trial (NCT01117818) provided unexpected evidence of benefits of the vaccine adjuvant AD04 (aluminum oxyhydroxide) in patients with early Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared with AD02, a vaccine consisting of a peptide that mimics the N-terminal region of human amyloid-β (Aβ) conjugated with keyhole limpet hemocyanin. Objective The objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess whether this unexpected benefit of AD04 was an artifact of multiple testing (i.e., type I error inflation) or a robust result. Methods In this post hoc assessment, we used permutation testing to estimate type I error inflation due to the evaluation of multiple outcomes in AFF006. Efficacy was assessed using a patient-level global statistical test combining composite endpoints of cognition, function, and global AD. In addition, we examined the observed treatment benefits of AD04 in the context of effects observed in trials of aducanumab, donanemab, and lecanemab, monoclonal anti-Aβ antibodies that received regulatory approval for AD. Results The global statistical test suggested a treatment benefit of AD04 versus ineffective AD02 arms, even after accounting for multiplicity (primary methodology p-value, 0.03; permutation test p-value, 0.02). The observed effect estimates for AD04 compared favorably with approved monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions Post-hoc analyses are hypothesis generating rather than confirmatory. Adjusting for multiplicity using permutation testing can determine whether post-hoc effects are worth pursuing, or unlikely to be confirmed. These analyses have motivated a follow-up prospective randomized controlled trial, ADVANCE (EudraCT 2022-003532-73), in which optimized AD04 dosing will be compared to placebo in early AD.
2025 · Alzheimers Dement (N Y)
Haaland, Benjamin · Nicodemus-Johnson, Jessie · Dickson, Samuel · Christensen, Joshua · Mallinckrodt, Craig · Hendrix, Suzanne
Introduction: Gamma oscillations in the brain are necessary for normal cognitive function, sensory processing, and memory consolidation, and are reduced in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In a 6 month, randomized, feasibility trial in participants with mild-to-moderate AD (OVERTURE [NCT03556280], n = 76), a non-invasive method for sensory-evoked brain gamma oscillations outperformed sham on the secondary outcomes of slowing decline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) functional scale, magnetic resonance imaging measures of whole brain volume and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) cognitive outcome, despite not showing statistical significance on the primary outcome (Mild and Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Composite [MADCOMS]), a composite cognitive-functional score. In this post hoc analysis of OVERTURE, we evaluated the effects of investigational sensory-evoked gamma oscillation treatment in terms of time saved, as an estimate of slowing in disease progression, on ADCS-ADL, MMSE, and whole-brain volume. Methods: Disease trajectories based on the ADCS-ADL, MMSE, and whole-brain volume changes from baseline within each treatment group were constructed using mixed-effects models. Horizontal projection from active to sham arm yielded time saved from baseline at each visit. Data from the open label extension (OLE) phase of the OVERTURE study have also been used to analyze the time-saving effect of active treatment in an extended period. Results: Compared to sham, time savings of 4.83, 4.59, and 4.09 months over 6 months of active treatment on ADCS-ADL, MMSE, and whole-brain atrophy were observed in the randomized controlled trial phase. When including the OLE phase, time savings of 8.66, 10.00, and 7.48 months over 14.64, 15.98, and 13.46 months of active treatment on ADCS-ADL, MMSE, and whole-brain atrophy were observed relative to the sham group. Discussion: These findings suggest that further exploration of the effect of evoked gamma oscillations in participants with mild-to-moderate AD, as well as the evaluation of treatment effects using time saved, is merited. Highlights: Evoked gamma oscillation slows functional loss and brain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease.Slowing of functional and cognitive decline and brain atrophy worsening can be expressed as time saved.Evoked gamma oscillation saves 4.83 months of progression in activities of daily living, 4.59 months of progression in Mini-Mental State Examination, and 4.09 months of decline in whole-brain volume over 6 months.
2025 · Int Psychogeriatr
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is often associated with agitation and aggression, which may impair function, impede care, and be a major source of stress for caregivers. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is often used to assess agitation and aggression. In its original, nursing-home version, it is a 29-item, caregiver-informed, clinician-administered 7-point scale that assesses the frequency of various agitation or aggressive behaviors. However, the instruction manual advises against the use of the total score in favor of a domain-based analysis. This recommendation has been followed in both clinical trials and practice. Because the CMAI is comprehensive and easy to administer, we sought to determine the validity of its total score as a single construct for assessing agitation and aggression in patients with AD. Methods: We used a previously conducted factor analysis of the CMAI scores from two risperidone trials in patients with dementia (N = 648), and a follow-up analysis of the subset of patients with psychosis of AD (N = 479), to examine, using vector analysis and an effect-size-versus-signal-to-noise ratio analysis, whether the total CMAI score could confidently be used as a global measure of agitation and aggression in AD. Results: Our findings suggest that the CMAI items from the dataset analyzed load into 4 clusters, which cover about 50 % of the total data variance. Surprisingly, items with the lowest signal-to-noise ratio (hitting, performing repetitious mannerisms, aimless pacing or wandering) had the strongest response to treatment (and vice versa), and belonged to different factors. The further observation that many items were spread among the factors, instead of primarily measuring a single factor or domain, suggests that there is a continuum of symptoms, and separating them into domains requires separating very similar items that measure two or more domains. Conclusions: These findings suggest that assessing agitation and aggression via CMAI domains instead of the total score is likely to miss important behavioral signals. Using total CMAI score in clinical trials and practice, along with the assessment of individual items, is warranted.
2024 · Alzheimers Dement (N Y)
Hendrix, Suzanne · Nicodemus-Johnson, Jessie · Knowlton, Newman
Introduction: Sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol (PB and TURSO) is hypothesized to mitigate endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, two of many mechanisms implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology. Methods: The first-in-indication phase 2a PEGASUS trial was designed to gain insight into PB and TURSO effects on mechanistic targets of engagement and disease biology in AD. The primary clinical efficacy outcome was a global statistical test combining three endpoints relevant to disease trajectory (cognition [Mild/Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score], function [Functional Activities Questionnaire], and total hippocampal volume on magnetic resonance imaging). Secondary clinical outcomes included various cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric assessments. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers spanning multiple pathophysiological pathways in AD were evaluated in participants with both baseline and Week 24 samples (exploratory outcome). Results: PEGASUS enrolled 95 participants (intent-to-treat [ITT] cohort); cognitive assessments indicated significantly greater baseline cognitive impairment in the PB and TURSO (n = 51) versus placebo (n = 44) group. Clinical efficacy outcomes did not significantly differ between treatment groups in the ITT cohort. CSF interleukin-15 increased from baseline to Week 24 within the placebo group (n = 34). In the PB and TURSO group (n = 33), reductions were observed in core AD biomarkers phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181) and total tau; synaptic and neuronal degeneration biomarkers neurogranin and fatty acid binding protein-3 (FABP3); and gliosis biomarker chitinase 3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), while the oxidative stress marker 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) increased. Between-group differences were observed for the Aβ42/40 ratio, p-tau181, total tau, neurogranin, FABP3, YKL-40, interleukin-15, and 8-OHdG. Additional neurodegeneration, inflammation, and metabolic biomarkers showed no differences between groups. Discussion: While between-group differences in clinical outcomes were not observed, most likely due to the small sample size and relatively short treatment duration, exploratory biomarker analyses suggested that PB and TURSO engages multiple pathophysiologic pathways in AD.
2024 · J Prev Alzheimers Dis
Dickson, Samuel · Brownlee, Allison · Haaland, Benjamin · Mallinckrodt, Craig · Hendrix, Suzanne
Assessment of meaningfulness in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging, particularly in early disease. Converting clinical outcomes to disease progression time allows assessment of treatment effects using a metric that is understandable and meaningful: time. We demonstrate time savings assessments using meta time component tests (TCTs) in the LipiDiDiet multinutrient RCT. Dietary patterns are important for dementia prevention, likely due to individual cumulative nutrient effects. LipiDiDiet used a multinutrient (Fortasyn Connect) formulation in patients with prodromal AD, benefitting cognition (5-item composite NTB, effect 0.089), cognition and function (CDR-SB, -0.605), and slowing hippocampal atrophy (0.122 cm3). Meaningfulness of point differences is unclear. However, a combination TCT showed 9-month disease time savings at 24 months (38% slowing of disease time): 9.0, 10.5, and 7.2 months for NTB, CDR-SB, and hippocampal volume, underscoring the value of TCTs in AD RCTs and the need for continued validation of this approach.
2024 · Cerebellum
Dickson, Samuel · O'Keefe, Patrick · Hendrix, Suzanne
Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA) are rare inherited neurodegenerative disorders characterized by a progressive impairment of gait, balance, limb coordination, and speech. There is currently no composite scale that includes multiple aspects of the SCA experience to assess disease progression and treatment effects. Applying the method of partial least squares (PLS) regression, we developed the Spinocerebellar Ataxia Composite Scale (SCACOMS) from two SCA natural history datasets (NCT01060371, NCT02440763). PLS regression selected items based on their ability to detect clinical decline, with optimized weights based on the item's degree of progression. Following model validation, SCACOMS was leveraged to examine disease progression and treatment effects in a 48-week SCA clinical trial cohort (NCT03701399). Items from the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I), the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) - functional stage, and the Modified Functional Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (f-SARA) were objectively selected with weightings based on their sensitivity to clinical decline. The resulting SCACOMS exhibited improved sensitivity to disease progression and greater treatment effects (compared to the original scales from which they were derived) in a 48-week clinical trial of a novel therapeutic agent. The trial analyses also provided a SCACOMS-derived estimate of the temporal delay in SCA disease progression. SCACOMS is a useful composite measure, effectively capturing disease progression and highlighting treatment effects in patients with SCA. SCACOMS will be a powerful tool in future studies given its sensitivity to clinical decline and ability to detect a meaningful clinical impact of disease-modifying treatments.
2024 · Front Neurol
Nicodemus-Johnson, Jessie · Hendrix, Suzanne
Background: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a multifactorial, progressive neurodegenerative disease that disrupts synaptic and neuronal activity and network oscillations. It is characterized by neuronal loss, brain atrophy and a decline in cognitive and functional abilities. Cognito's Evoked Gamma Therapy System provides an innovative approach for AD by inducing EEG-verified gamma oscillations through sensory stimulation. Prior research has shown promising disease-modifying effects in experimental AD models. The present study (NCT03556280: OVERTURE) evaluated the feasibly, safety and efficacy of evoked gamma oscillation treatment using Cognito's medical device (CogTx-001) in participants with mild to moderate AD. Methods: The present study was a randomized, double blind, sham-controlled, 6-months clinical trial in participants with mild to moderate AD. The trial enrolled 76 participants, aged 50 or older, who met the clinical criteria for AD with baseline MMSE scores between 14 and 26. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive self-administered daily, one-hour, therapy, evoking EEG-verified gamma oscillations or sham treatment. The CogTx-001 device was use at home with the help of a care partner, over 6 months. The primary outcome measures were safety, evaluated by physical and neurological exams and monthly assessments of adverse events (AEs) and MRI, and tolerability, measured by device use. Although the trial was not statistically powered to evaluate potential efficacy outcomes, primary and secondary clinical outcome measures included several cognitive and functional endpoints. Results: Total AEs were similar between groups, there were no unexpected serious treatment related AEs, and no serious treatment-emergent AEs that led to study discontinuation. MRI did not show Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) in any study participant. High adherence rates (85-90%) were observed in sham and treatment participants. There was no statistical separation between active and sham arm participants in primary outcome measure of MADCOMS or secondary outcome measure of CDR-SB or ADAS-Cog14. However, some secondary outcome measures including ADCS-ADL, MMSE, and MRI whole brain volume demonstrated reduced progression in active compared to sham treated participants, that achieved nominal significance. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that 1-h daily treatment with Cognito's Evoked Gamma Therapy System (CogTx-001) was safe and well-tolerated and demonstrated potential clinical benefits in mild to moderate AD. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03556280.
2023 · Alzheimers Res Ther
Dickson, Samuel · Hennessey, Sean · Nicodemus-Johnson, Jessie · Knowlton, Newman · Hendrix, Suzanne
Key points of disagreement between the aducanumab FDA statistical review, which had primarily negative conclusions, and the clinical review, which had primarily positive conclusions, were investigated. Results from secondary endpoints in positive Study 302 were significant and these endpoints provided meaningful additional information. Findings indicate the statistical review of the aducanumab data was incorrect in a number of key areas. Greater placebo decline was not responsible for the significant results in Study 302. Correlations did exist between reduction in β-amyloid and clinical outcomes. Missing data and functional unblinding did not likely bias results. In contrast, the clinical review went too far in saying the negative results in Study 301 did not detract from the positive results in Study 302, as all clinical data should be considered in the evaluation, and the clinical review accepted the company's explanation for divergence of the results between the studies although much of the divergence remained unexplained. Interestingly, both the statistical review and the clinical review considered the available efficacy evidence despite both studies being terminated early. Implications of these findings include that the divergence in results seen in the two phase 3 aducanumab studies can be expected in other studies with similar design and analysis. Therefore, further research is needed to determine if analysis methods other than MMRM and/or optimized outcomes will provide more consistent results across studies.
2023 · medRxiv
Nicodemus-Johnson, Jessie · Hendrix, Suzanne
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a multifactorial, progressive neurodegenerative disease that disrupts cognitive function through maladaptive misfolded proteins, abnormal neuroimmune responses, and disordered neuronal network activities. Despite continued scientific advances in the understanding of AD biology, there remains an unmet need for safe and effective disease-modifying treatments. Sensory stimulation is an emerging therapeutic approach which has demonstrated disease-modifying effects in preclinical transgenic models of AD. This randomized, sham-controlled, clinical trial (OVERTURE; NCT03556280) evaluated the feasibility and safety of 40Hz auditory and visual stimulation with the CogTx-001 medical device in 70 participants with mild to moderate AD, administered as daily, 1-hour active stimulation (as compared to sham stimulation) over a 6-month period. Primary endpoints of the therapy showed that it was well-tolerated, showed high adherence and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Secondary outcomes included exploratory outcomes measures such as ADCS-ADL and MMSE scores, which demonstrated significant effects on functional and cognitive abilities. Additionally, sensory stimulation also showed a significant reduction in brain volume loss and cortical thinning, without changes in amyloid PET signal in active versus sham groups. These encouraging results justify further development of 40Hz sensory stimulation as a safe and potentially disease-modifying therapy for AD patients.
2022 · Neurology
Nicodemus-Johnson, Jessie · Hendrix, Suzanne
Objective: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, adherence, and efficacy of 40Hz sensory stimulation therapy in subjects with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Background: 40Hz gamma sensory stimulation diminishes AD pathology, neurodegeneration, and brain atrophy, synaptic and learning dysfunctions in transgenic mice carrying AD-related human pathological genes (Adaikkan & Tsai, 2020). These results initiated the development and validation of non-invasive, gamma sensory stimulation as a potential therapeutic for AD treatment. Design/Methods: Participants on AD spectrum were randomized to receive daily, one-hour, EEG-calibrated, noninvasive audio-visual stimulation, or sham stimulation in a 6-month clinical trial (Overture trial; NCT03556280) using Cognito Therapeutics medical device. Both safety (MRI, physical and neurological exams), and efficacy (AD cognitive and functional instruments, volumetric MRI) were assessed. Results: A total of 135 subjects were screened, 74 were randomized, and 53 completed the trial. The rate of AEs during the trial were roughly equivalent between groups. There were no unexpected serious treatment adverse events. Over the 6-month treatment period, changes in ADCS-ADL scores were significantly better in the treatment group compared to sham, indicating a 78% slowing in functional decline (P<0.0003). Similarly, the treatment group demonstrated a statistically significant 83% (p<0.013) reduction in cognitive decline, shown by changes in MMSE scores. The outcomes of MADCOMs, ADAS-cog14 and CDR-sb were not statistically different between groups. Quantitative MRI analysis revealed that whole brain volume loss in the treatment group demonstrated a significant, 72% reduction in brain atrophy (p<0.01) compared to sham group. Reduced lateral ventricle enlargement and diminished loss in cortical thickness in the occipital cortex have been also observed. MRI data demonstrated absence of ARIA in all subjects. Conclusions: Long-term, daily, self-administered, home-use of gamma sensory stimulation is both safe and well tolerated in AD subjects. Patients given gamma stimulation therapy maintained cognitive and functional abilities. Gamma sensory stimulation reduced brain atrophy, indicating potential disease-modifying effects in AD.
2020 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Dickson, Samuel · Knowlton, Newman · Hendrix, Suzanne
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a multi-symptom disease which has cognitive, behavioral, functional and global outcomes. These outcomes are all important measures of disease severity and are driven by the underlying disease process. These symptoms provide multiple, potentially conflicting, answers to the question, “Did the treatment work?” Method: Outcomes can be combined through standardization of outcomes using ranks or z-scores. Additionally, the standardization can be performed before calculating change from baseline or after. These four combinations are explored by simulations with no effect, corroborative effects across outcomes, and disparate effects across outcomes (a mix of positive and null effects) to demonstrate the type I error (no effect) and power under various secenarios along with other performance metrics. Result: All four methods of calculating a GST adequately control type I error. In the absence of ceiling and floor effects, the GST that calculates change from baseline first then combines evidence using z-scores has the highest power. In the presence of disparate effects, the GST can still be more powerful than any single outcome, though the effect is appropriately attenuated. The GSTs that use ranking outperform z-score methods in the presence of strong floor or ceiling effects. Conclusion: A clinical trial with a GST analyzed first can show success as a proof of concept even if the individual outcomes fail to achieve significance, signalling that a development can proceed to later phases. Change from baseline should be calculated first. If there are no ceiling or floor effects, standardization should be performed using z-scores, otherwise percentiles should be used. GSTs offer a good way to combine outcomes to demonstrate efficacy using fewer subjects.
2020 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background The AMBAR study enrolled 496 mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients from Spain and US centers, 347 of which were randomized [1:1:1:1] to three treatment arms of plasma exchange (PE) with different doses of albumin with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or placebo (sham PE) arm. PE treatment showed slow cognitive and functional decline in AD patients, with variable significance in outcome (primary: ADCS-ADL, ADAS-Cog; secondary: CDR-Sb, ADCS-CGIC), baseline disease severity, and treatment arm (low-albumin; low-albumin+IVIG, high-albumin+IVIG, and all three combined). The percentage of patient dropouts ranged from 20% in the placebo to 34.9% in the low-albumin+IVIG group. In this analysis we investigated the effect of possible biases due to discontinuations and baseline imbalances, and assessed the consistency across outcomes. Method The impact of discontinuations was determined by least squares mean estimates from the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis using the z-score carried forward analysis (zLOCF). The overall impact of the treatment on the disease was determined by a global statistical test which combined with equal weighting three outcomes (ADCS-ADL, ADAS-Cog, CDR-Sb) into a single outcome. An analysis of relevant outcomes was performed adjusting for key baseline characteristics. Result Analysis of discontinuations suggested that the treatment differences and effect sizes estimated using the primary model MMRM are likely to be conservative and that lowering dropouts is likely to increase effect sizes. Effect sizes were consistent across outcomes (between 51% and 76%). The GST score showed slowing of progression at month 14 with statistically significant differences between all active treatments and placebo from month 9 onward. When the model was adjusted for key baseline characteristics, the analysis showed statistically significant differences against placebo of all treatment groups in most of the relevant outcomes. Conclusion Results of this analysis disprove the possible bias of dropout effect in the AMBAR trial. Effect sizes were consistent across outcomes and the Global Statistical Test showed an overall impact of the treatment on the disease. The analysis corrected for baseline factors supports and reinforces the findings that the PE-treated arms were superior to the placebo group.
2020 · 2020 Alzheimer's Association International Conference
Background: Diet and nutrition are important modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). For the last two decades, the LipiDiDiet consortium has been investigating the role of nutrients and their synergistic action on key AD pathological features. Based on preclinical results, 11 nutrients were selected which, when applied in this specific combination, gave the best results in rodent AD models: i.e. the omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA, phospholipids, vitamins B6, B12, folic acid, C and E, choline, selenium, and UMP. The LipiDiDiet trial1 is a 6-year, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-centre, randomised controlled clinical trial, designed to investigate effects of the specific multinutrient combination Fortasyn Connect on cognition and related measures in prodromal AD. Initial 24 month results showed significant benefit on clinical dementia rating-sum of boxes (CDR-SB) and hippocampal and ventricular volumes in the modified intention-to-treat population. Here we report previously specified primary and secondary outcomes over 36 months of intervention. Method: Prodromal AD participants (n=311) were randomised to receive either active product (125 mL drink containing Fortasyn Connect) or a calorie-matched placebo control once daily. Result: 162 participants completed the 36-month period. With increasing treatment duration, the benefit of the active group over the control group exceeded what had been observed for the first 24 months (Soininen et al., Lancet Neurology 2017). For the 5-item neuropsychological test battery (NTB) on cognition, a significant between-group difference was observed in estimated mean change from baseline over 36 months favouring active intervention (0.212 [95% CI 0.044 to 0.380]; p=0.014; 60% reduction in decline). In addition, significant benefits were found on CDR-SB, NTB memory, and hippocampal, ventricular, and whole brain volumes on MRI. Self-reported compliance to the study product was high and there was no indication of safety concern. Conclusion: We observed significantly slower decline in cognition including memory, CDR-SB measuring cognition and function, and brain structural measures. Importantly, prolonged intervention with this specific combination of nutrients resulted in a broader range of endpoints showing statistically significant differences. Sustainable benefits lasting for 3 or more years have not been reported before in prodromal AD.
2019 · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
As research evolves in prodromal AD, the need to validate sufficiently sensitive outcome measures, e.g. the Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) is clear. In the LipiDiDiet randomized trial in prodromal AD, cognitive decline in the study population was much less than expected in the timeframe studied. While the primary composite endpoint was insufficiently sensitive to detect a difference in the modified intention to treat population, the per-protocol population showed less decline in the active than the control group, indicating better treatment effects with regular product intake. These results were further strengthened by significant benefits on secondary endpoints of cognition and function, and brain atrophy. The present post-hoc analysis investigated whether ADCOMS could detect a difference between groups in the LipiDiDiet population (138 active, 140 control). The estimated mean change in ADCOMS from baseline (standard error) was 0.085 (0.018) in the active and 0.133 (0.018) in the control group; estimated mean treatment difference −0.048 (95% confidence intervals −0.090, −0.007; p=0.023), or 36% less decline in the active group. This suggests ADCOMS identified the cognitive and functional benefits observed previously, confirming the sensitivity of this composite measure.
2019 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: Amylyx has developed a novel therapeutic, AMX0035, for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease. AMX0035 is a proprietary combination of two small molecule compounds, Sodium Phenylbutyrate (PB) and Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid (TUDCA), de-signed to promote neuronal viability through simultaneous inhibition of ER stress and mitochondrial stress. PB and TUDCA have been evaluated separately in in vitro and in vivo models of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. Amylyx discovered a synergy between these two compounds when administered together in a particular range of ratios across multiple preclinical models. Recruitment for the clinical trial began in late 2018. Methods: The study will evaluate safety, tolerability, and biomarkers of molecular target engagement, AD pathology, neurodegeneration and neurophysiology that indicate AMX0035 target engagement and neurobiological effects over 24 weeks. This will be a 6-month, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of people with late mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early to moderate dementia due to AD. Participants in the active treatment arm will receive 3g of PB and 1g TUDCA administered orally twice daily. Results: Participants will be evaluated at Poster Presentations: Wednesday, July 17, 2019P1282baseline and at week 24 with multi-sequence structural and functional MRI to assess changes in regional brain volumes (T1), cerebral perfusion (ASL), functional connectivity (BOLD) and cerebrovascular pathology (FLAIR, SWI). Lumbar punctures will be performed at baseline and 24 weeks for selected CSF biomarkers including: amyloid-b1-42, tau, neurofilament light chain (NfL), and markers of mitochondrial redox, HDAC activity, neuronal injury, and neuroinflammation. Patients will be evaluated at weeks 1, 6,12, 18, and 24 for safety, tolerability, and changes in symptoms, as measured with the ADAS-Cog 13, ADCS-ADL, and NPI. Conclusions: This early phase trial is designed to evince target engagement, neurobiological effects, safety and tolerability of AMX0035with multiple objective endpoints including, standard clinical assessments and both established and novel biomarkers associated with neurocognitive impairment. Data will help determine whether to advance AMX0035 to a larger study to establish efficacy and safety and inform choices in study design, patient characteristics and outcome measures.
2019 · Neurology
Objective: To assess the effect of memantine (MEM) and a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) vs ChEI alone on four syndrome domains of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms negatively impact daily function and quality of life, hasten time to institutionalization, and increase overall healthcare costs. MEM significantly improved multiple domain scores of the NPI in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared with placebo (PBO). Design/Methods: Data were pooled for participants with moderate to severe AD (baseline MMSE<20) from three, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled 24-week trials (Tariot et al. JAMA, 2004; Porsteinsson et al. Alzheimer Research, 2008; Grossberg et al. CNS Drugs, 2013). The NPI has 12 items that were grouped into four syndrome domains: psychosis (agitation/aggression, hallucinations, delusions, irritability/lability), neurovegetative (aberrant motor behavior, nighttime behavior, appetite/eating change), frontal (disinhibition, euphoria/elation), and mood (anxiety, depression/dysphoria, apathy), based on previous analyses (Frisoni et al. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 10:130–138, 1999). MEM/ChEI- and PBO/ChEI-treated participants were compared using an ANCOVA model estimating change from baseline at each time point. Results: Of 1262 patients, 637 were treated with MEM/ChEIs and 625 with PBO/ChEIs (age [mean±SD]: 75.7±8.3 years; baseline MMSE: 11.5±3.5; baseline NPI total score: 14.9±14.6). For all syndrome domains, mean treatment differences favored MEM/ChEIs over PBO/ChEIs. For psychosis symptoms, MEM/ChEI-treated patients improved significantly compared with PBO/ChEI-treated patients at 12 (LSMD −1.167, P<0.0001) and 24 (LSMD −1.238, P<0.0001) weeks. Similarly, neurovegetative scores were significantly improved for MEM/ChEI vs PBO/ChEI-treated patients at 12 (LSMD −0.621, P=0.0103) and 24 (LSMD −0.583, P=0.0441) weeks. For frontal and mood symptoms, no significant LSMDs were observed at 12 or 24 weeks. No analyses showed PBO/ChEI to be superior to MEM/ChEI. Conclusions: In patients with moderate to severe AD taking ChEIs, treatment with the combination of memantine and a ChEI was associated with significant benefit for psychosis and neurovegetative behavioral syndromes compared with ChEI alone.
2019 · Neurology
Objective: To evaluate the effect of the combination of memantine (MEM) with a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) vs placebo (PBO) with ChEI on total Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) and three higher-order cognitive domains (memory, language, and praxis). Background: The SIB is used to assess cognitive changes in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), allowing for reliable, valid, and sensitive detection of treatment effects when floor effects may be present on other cognitive tests. MEM results in significant improvements on the SIB compared with PBO in moderate to severe AD patients treated concurrently with a ChEI. Design/Methods: Data were pooled from two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled 24-week trials (Tariot et al. JAMA, 2004; Grossberg et al. CNS Drugs, 2013) in patients with moderate to severe AD (baseline MMSE score<20). The SIB was administered at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24. Based on Schmitt et al. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 2006, SIB domains were aggregated to create higher-order subscales of memory (memory, attention, orientation, orienting to name), language (language, social interaction), and praxis (praxis, visuospatial ability, construction). Results: Compared with PBO/ChEI, MEM/ChEI significantly improved total SIB scores at weeks 8, 12, 18, and 24 (all, P<0.05). An analysis of higher-order domains demonstrated that MEM/ChEI treatment conferred significant effects on memory and language vs PBO/ChEI at weeks 12, 18, and 24 (all, P<0.05). On the higher-order domain of praxis, MEM/ChEI showed significant effects vs PBO/ChEI at all timepoints (weeks 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24, all P<0.05). Conclusions: The combination of MEM with a ChEI produced early and consistent improvements in cognition for patients with moderate to severe AD. Analysis of higher-order domains on the SIB further supported the efficacy of MEM in maintaining key cognitive functions (memory, language, and praxis), even when these patients are receiving the standard of ongoing ChEI treatment.
2019 · Neurology
Objective: This clinical trial investigated the effects of a precision medicine intervention on cognition in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients. Background: Multidomain approaches to treating modifiable risk factors in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have shown cognitive benefits for patients at-risk for dementia. Design/Methods: Patients aged 25–86 were recruited from an Alzheimer’s prevention clinic and categorized into two groups. The prevention group (group 1) included normal cognition, subjective cognitive decline, and preclinical AD patients. The early treatment group (group 2) included predominantly MCI due to AD as well as mild AD dementia patients. Primary outcome was change in performance on a cognitive composite (m-APCC) measuring AD pathology in higher- versus lower-compliance participants at 18 months in groups 1 and 2. We also compared groups versus matched historical controls from NACC/Rush University. Secondary outcome was change in performance on a non-pathological cognitive aging composite (CAC). Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03687710). Results: Of 202 participants screened, 178 met inclusion criteria; 154 (87%) had at least one post-baseline assessment and were included in analyses. Group 1 improved on the m-APCC by 0.426 at 18-months (p<0.0001). Similar effects were seen for higher and lower compliance groups (p=0.1467). Group 1 higher-compliance participants improved more than NACC (p=0.0039) and Rush controls (p=0.0133). Group 1 lower compliance participants also improved more than NACC (p=0.0105) and Rush (p=0.0259) controls. In group 2, higher compliance participants improved relative to lower compliance participants (p<0.0001) and NACC (p=0.0069), but not compared to Rush (p=0.3953). For group 1, the CAC improved by 2.67 years for higher-compliance participants and 3.52 years for lower-compliance participants (p=0.4039). Group 2 improved by 2.95 years in the CAC for higher-compliance participants and worsened by 5.06 years for lower-compliance participants (p=0.0004). Conclusions: Findings suggest a precision medicine multidomain intervention can improve cognitive function. Intervening earlier in the pre-AD dementia diagnostic spectrum led to greater improvements.
2018 · Neurology
Objective: To evaluate Neuropsychiatric Index (NPI) maintenance of response from weeks 12–24 between patients receiving memantine/ChEI vs placebo/ChEI. Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms, as measured by the NPI, impact daily function and quality of life, hasten time to institutionalization, and increase healthcare costs in patients with AD. Memantine significantly improves NPI scores vs placebo in moderate-to-severe AD. Maintenance of response represents a meaningful treatment benefit and symptom stabilization. Design/Methods: Post hoc analyses used pooled data from moderate to severe (baseline MMSE ≤19)patients (N=1121) in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (MEM-MD-02 [Tariot et al, JAMA 2004], MEM-MD-50 [Grossberg et al, CNS Drugs 2013], and MEM-MD-12 [Porsteinsson et al, Curr Alzheimer Res 2008]). To characterize NPI responder rates, evenly spaced change from baseline score groups (≤0, ≤−3, ≤−6, ≤−9, ≤−12) were identified. Maintenance of response was defined as total NPI score change at week 12 (earliest pooled timepoint) that was maintained through week 24 (endpoint). The percentages of patients who maintained response were compared between patients receiving memantine/ChEI or placebo/ChEI using Fisher’s exact test with observed case. Results: Pooled data showed that greater proportions of moderate-to-severe patients treated with memantine/ChEI maintained improvements on total NPI from weeks 12–24 compared with placebo/ChEI patients. For memantine/ChEI-treated vs PBO/ChEI-treated patients, 23.4% vs 18.2% maintained improvements of 6 points or more (P=0.0332); 17.0% vs 11.5% maintained improvements of 9 points or more (P=0.0103); 13.3% vs 7.7% maintained improvements of 12 points or more (P=0.0024). Conclusions: The combination of memantine added to ChEI resulted in improvements on total NPI that were sustained over weeks 12–24 of treatment in this OC analysis, which may represent clinically meaningful improvements for patients with moderate-to-severe AD with neuropsychiatric symptoms. For clinicians, the ability to characterize treatment effects of combination therapy over time may be useful in identifying treatment options and setting patient and caregiver expectations.
2018 · Neurology
Objective: To examine Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) score changes (improvement or worsening) of ≥5, ≥10, and ≥15 points for patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) receiving memantine ER (MemER)/cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) vs placebo (PBO)/ChEI. Background: Rigorous phase 3 studies demonstrated memantine efficacy, in combination with ChEI, on cognition, function, and global outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. In a randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study (NCT00322153, MemER/ChEI treatment significantly improved SIB scores vs PBO/ChEI, with a PBO-adjusted mean difference of 2.6 points at week 24. Design/Methods: Post hoc analyses examined SIB baseline-to-endpoint (week 24) score changes in patients receiving an ChEI randomized to MemER (28 mg/day) or PBO. SIB score changes were examined in 5-point increments (eg, absolute changes of 1–5, 6–10, 11–15). “Improvement/decline” was noted at 5-point changes; “notable improvement/decline” at 10-point changes; and “remarkable improvement/decline” at 15-point changes. Results: Of 676 patients (safety population), 541 had SIB scores at baseline and week 24 (n=270 MemER/ChEI; n=271 PBO/ChEI). At week 24, 40% of MemER/ChEI patients experienced a ≥5-point SIB improvement vs 31% of PBO/ChEI patients. More MemER/ChEI patients had notable improvements of ≥10 points vs PBO/ChEI patients (23% vs 13%); twice as many had remarkable improvements (≥15 points) with MemER/ChEI vs PBO/ChEI (14% vs 7%). Fewer MemER/ChEI patients declined by ≥5 points vs PBO/ChEI (19% vs 24%), with similar results at declines of ≥10 (10% vs 13%) and ≥15 (6% vs 7%). Conclusions: Compared with PBO/ChEI, more MemER/ChEI-treated patients experienced improvements of ≥5, ≥10 and ≥15 points on the SIB, all greater than the PBO-adjusted mean of 2.6 points; fewer MemER/ChEI-patients experienced a decline in cognition. As no disease-modifying AD treatments are available, these data reaffirm the efficacy of combination therapy with MemER/ChEI on cognition and support its use in patients with moderate to severe AD.
2018 · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Introduction: Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) represents a crucial population for identifying prevention strategies that might modify disease course for cognitively unimpaired individuals at high imminent risk for developing symptoms due to Alzheimer's disease (AD), that is, who have “preclinical” AD. Crenezumab is an antiamyloid monoclonal antibody that binds monomeric and aggregated forms of amyloid β, with highest affinity for oligomers; it is in development for early stages of sporadic AD and for ADAD. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of the efficacy of crenezumab versus placebo in asymptomatic PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers from family kindreds with ADAD in Colombia. Participants were randomized to receive either crenezumab or placebo for 260 weeks. The study was designed to enroll a planned total of 300 participants, including 200 preclinical mutation carriers (approximately 100 treatment, 100 placebo) and an additional control group of mutation noncarriers from the same family kindreds included to mask mutation carrier status (100 placebo only). The primary outcome is change in the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative ADAD Composite Cognitive Test Score from baseline to week 260. Secondary outcomes include time to progression to mild cognitive impairment due to AD or dementia due to AD; changes in dementia severity, memory, and overall neurocognitive functioning; and changes in amyloid–positron emission tomography, fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging volumes, and cerebrospinal fluid levels of β amyloid, tau, and p-tau. Safety and tolerability are assessed. Results: Two hundred fifty-two participants were enrolled between December 2013 and February 2017. Discussion: We describe the first large-scale, potentially label-enabling clinical trial of a preclinical treatment for ADAD. Results from this trial will inform on the efficacy of crenezumab for delaying onset of, slowing decline in, or preventing cognitive impairment in individuals with preclinical ADAD and will foster an improved understanding of AD biomarkers and their relationship to clinical outcomes.
2017 · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Background: Numerous statistically derived composite measures have recently been proposed as clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for clinical trials in the early stages of Alzheimer disease. Critical Path Institute’s Coalition Against Major Diseases (CAMD) advanced a proposed statistically derived composite measure to regulatory agencies with the goal of qualifying it as a COA for pre-dementia trials. In response to FDA’s requirement to demonstrate that proposed COAs are meaningful to patients, this project aimed to identify the most important cognition-related concerns patients and informants report early in the disease and determine how this information maps to what is assessed by several statistically derived composite measures. Methods: Leveraging qualitative research completed by Critical Path Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, CAMD utilized a summary report that included frequency grids of reported concerns of amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients and their informants, as well as the narrative transcripts from focus groups. Transcripts were reviewed and analyzed to identify which cognitive domains the patient- and informant-reported concerns mapped onto. The results were then compared to see how well these cognitive domains were represented in various statistically derived composite measures. Results: The patient- and informant-reported concerns primarily mapped to the cognitive domains of episodic memory and, secondarily, orientation and language. Depending on the specified composite, there were varying levels of alignment between their subcomponents and these cognitive domains. Conclusion: Through secondary analyses of existing qualitative data, this study examined several statistically derived composite measures and found that they generally capture cognitive domains that reflect aspects of day-to-day functioning that patients and informants consider meaningful.
2017 · Neurology
Objective: To explore the effects of extended-release (ER) memantine (28 mg, once daily) on outcome measure combinations in the subset of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients receiving donepezil during the MEM-MD-50 trial (NCT00322153). Background: The efficacy of memantine ER was demonstrated in the 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, MEM-MD-50 (placebo, n=335; memantine, n=342) in patients with moderate to severe AD concurrently taking a cholinesterase inhibitor. Design/Methods: Efficacy outcomes included measures of cognition (SIB), function (ADCS-ADL19), behavior (NPI), and global status (CIBIC-Plus). In this post hoc analysis, two levels of response were defined for each measure: improvement or stabilization (“no decline”; baseline-to-endpoint improvement of ≥0 points for the SIB, ADCS-ADL19, and NPI; endpoint score ≤4 for CIBIC-Plus) and clinically notable response (baseline-to-endpoint improvement of ≥3 points for the SIB, ADCS-ADL19, and NPI; endpoint score ≤3 for CIBIC-Plus). Treatment groups were compared by calculating the proportions of patients who achieved no decline or a clinically notable response on any combination of 2, 3, or all 4 efficacy measures. Data were analyzed using observed cases and Wald’s test (α=0.05); numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were also calculated. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, no corrections for multiple comparisons were performed. Results: In patients receiving donepezil, the proportions of responders in the memantine ER group (n=187) exceeded those in the placebo group (n=184) for both response levels and all outcome combinations, except for the ADCS-ADL19 (≥3 points) in which responder proportions were almost identical. The difference between proportions of memantine ER- and placebo-treated patients who experienced no decline was significant for the SIB/CIBIC-Plus combination (62.0% vs 50.8%; P=0.0240, NNT=9). Conclusions: This exploratory post-hoc analysis suggests that, in patients with moderate to severe AD receiving donepezil, memantine ER provides simultaneous benefits on multiple clinical domains, especially stabilization of cognition and global status.
2017 · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
At a meeting of the EU/US/Clinical Trials in Alzheimer's Disease (CTAD) Task Force in December 2016, an international group of investigators from industry, academia, and regulatory agencies reviewed lessons learned from ongoing and planned prevention trials, which will help guide future clinical trials of AD treatments, particularly in the pre-clinical space. The Task Force discussed challenges that need to be addressed across all aspects of clinical trials, calling for innovation in recruitment and retention, infrastructure development, and the selection of outcome measures. While cognitive change provides a marker of disease progression across the disease continuum, there remains a need to identify the optimal assessment tools that provide clinically meaningful endpoints. Patient- and informant-reported assessments of cognition and function may be useful but present additional challenges. Imaging and other biomarkers are also essential to maximize the efficiency of and the information learned from clinical trials.
2017 · The Lancet Neurology
Background Nutrition is an important modifiable risk factor in Alzheimer's disease. Previous trials of the multinutrient Fortasyn Connect showed benefits in mild Alzheimer's disease dementia. LipiDiDiet investigated the effects of Fortasyn Connect on cognition and related measures in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Here, we report the 24-month results of the trial. Methods LipiDiDiet was a 24-month randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial (11 sites in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden), with optional 12-month double-blind extensions. The trial enrolled individuals with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, defined according to the International Working Group (IWG)-1 criteria. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to active product (125 mL once-a-day drink containing Fortasyn Connect) or control product. Randomisation was computer-generated centrally in blocks of four, stratified by site. All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change in a neuropsychological test battery (NTB) score. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. Safety analyses included all participants who consumed at least one study product dose. This trial is registered with the Dutch Trial Register, number NTR1705. Findings Between April 20, 2009, and July 3, 2013, 311 of 382 participants screened were randomly assigned to the active group (n=153) or control group (n=158). Mean change in NTB primary endpoint was −0·028 (SD 0·453) in the active group and −0·108 (0·528) in the control group; estimated mean treatment difference was 0·098 (95% CI −0·041 to 0·237; p=0·166). The decline in the control group was less than the prestudy estimate of −0·4 during 24 months. 66 (21%) participants dropped out of the study. Serious adverse events occurred in 34 (22%) participants in the active group and 30 (19%) in control group (p=0·487), none of which were regarded as related to the study intervention. Interpretation The intervention had no significant effect on the NTB primary endpoint over 2 years in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. However, cognitive decline in this population was much lower than expected, rendering the primary endpoint inadequately powered. Group differences on secondary endpoints of disease progression measuring cognition and function and hippocampal atrophy were observed. Further study of nutritional approaches with larger sample sizes, longer duration, or a primary endpoint more sensitive in this pre-dementia population, is needed.
2017 · Innovations in clinical neuroscience
An evolving paradigm shift in the diagnostic conceptualization of Alzheimer’s disease is reflected in its recently updated diagnostic criteria from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association and the International Working Group. Additionally, it is reflected in the increased focus in this field on conducting prevention trials in addition to improving cognition and function in people with dementia. These developments are making key contributions towards defining new regulatory thinking around Alzheimer’s disease treatment earlier in the disease continuum. As a result, the field as a whole is now concentrated on exploring the next-generation of cognitive and functional outcome measures that will support clinical trials focused on treating the slow slide into cognitive and functional impairment. With this backdrop, the International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened semi-annual working group meetings which began in spring of 2012 to address methodological issues in this area. This report presents the most critical issues around primary outcome assessments in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials, and summarizes the presentations, discussions, and recommendations of those meetings, within the context of the evolving landscape of Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials.
2017 · Neurology
Objective: To examine the effects of memantine extended-release (ER) on Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Background: In a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (NCT00322153), the efficacy of memantine ER (28 mg, once daily) on co-primary measures of cognition and global change was demonstrated in patients with moderate-to-severe AD (MMSE 3–14) concurrently taking a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI); treatment with adjunctive memantine ER did not achieve significance on the secondary measure of function, the 19-item Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL19). The lack of observed benefit of memantine on ADLs is in contrast to results from two pivotal memantine trials conducted in a similar patient population (MMSE 3–14 and MMSE 5–14). In those trials, monotherapy treatment with the immediate-release memantine conferred significant therapeutic benefits vs placebo on the ADCS-ADL. Design/Methods: In this post hoc analysis, the percentage of responders with ADCS-ADL19 change scores of ≤0, −2, −4, −6 and −8 were compared between treatment groups (memantine- and placebo-treated patients concurrently receiving a ChEI) using Fisher’s exact test. Results: While functional abilities declined in all patients, a greater percentage of patients treated with placebo (ChEI only) declined compared with those treated with memantine and ChEIs, with significant between-group differences observed among those with a change score of ≤-4 (20.0% placebo vs 12.1% memantine; P=0.0137), ≤-6 (13.3% vs 8.0%; P=0.0499), and ≤-8 (9.6% vs 4.9%; P=0.0453) by study end (weeks 18–24). Conclusions: This post hoc analysis suggests that the inevitable decline in function in moderate-to-severe AD patients may be ameliorated with memantine treatment compared with treatment with ChEIs alone.
2016 · Neurology
Objective: A pooled post hoc analysis of ADCS-ADL19 scores from two, 24-week, placebo-controlled trials was performed to evaluate the impact of combining memantine with ChEI treatment on daily functioning and assess potential clusters of functional tasks that improved together. Background: Moderate to severe Alzheimers disease is frequently treated with a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) in combination with memantine. Methods: Data were pooled from trials MEM-MD-02 and MEM-MD-50 (placebo+ChEI, n=525; memantine+ChEI, n=531). Factors were derived using a principal components analysis based on change-from-baseline item values (placebo and memantine groups combined), varimax rotation, maximum loading for each item, and eigenvalues of ≥1 for each factor with a designated maximum of 4 factors. Between-group comparisons of item and factor score changes used a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM; OC and LOCF) analysis. Results:At Week 24, there were significant advantages of memantine+ChEI treatment over placebo+ChEI for grooming (P<0.001), conversing (P=0.010), and finding belongings (P=0.002). The 4 subscales identified were: basic ADLs (eating, walking, toileting, bathing, grooming, dressing; loading value range [LVR]: 0.41-0.71), higher-level ADLs requiring communication/comprehension skills (using telephone, watching television, conversing, finding belongings, traveling, left alone; LVR: 0.37-0.58), simple praxis (faucet on, faucet off, light on; LVR: 0.53-0.80), and praxis items requiring visuo-spatial and memory skills (clearing table, obtaining beverage, disposing of litter, light off; LVR: 0.35-0.63). At Week 24, the memantine+ChEI group declined less than placebo+ChEI on each subscale: basic ADLs (least squares difference [LSDiff]=0.376; P=0.017), higher level ADLs (LSDiff=0.265; P=0.156), simple praxis (LSDiff=0.077; P=0.043), and praxis items requiring visuo-spatial and memory skills (LSDiff=0.300; P=0.017). Conclusions:The addition of memantine to stable ChEI treatment was associated with significant improvements in grooming, conversing, and finding belongings. The factor analysis identified 4 subscales, and significant advantages of memantine+ChEI treatment over placebo+ChEI for basic ADLs, simple praxis, and praxis items requiring visuo-spatial and memory skills.
2015 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: In patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) either with or without stable cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) treatment, clinical trials have shown significant and beneficial Baseline-to-Endpoint effects following memantine (MEM) treatment in comparison with placebo. Time to meaningful levels of change on outcome measures can also provide clinically relevant information for physicians. This new post hoc analysis used a time-to-event Kaplan-Meier methodology to evaluate clinically meaningful changes in four 6-7 month studies of memantine alone or in combination with a ChEI. Methods: The populations of 4 trials were pooled (N=1,628): 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of MEM IR (10 mg BID; 2 monotherapy; 1 of patients on stable donepezil) and 1 trial of MEM ER (28 mg QD; patients on stable ChEI regimen) in moderate to severe AD. Efficacy outcomes included cognition (SIB), function (ADCS-ADL19), behavior (NPI), and global status (CIBIC-Plus), and clinically meaningful events were defined as the median decline at Endpoint for placebo-only treated patients; the K-M method was used to compare median time to reach this point in the treatment groups and an unadjusted log-rank test was performed on the intent-to-treat population. Results: Meaningful events were defined as declines of ≥4 points on SIB, ≥3 points on ADCS-ADL19, NPI total score increase ≥0, and final score ≥5 for CIBIC-Plus. The median times-to-events (days) were: SIB (PBO-only: 85; PBO+ChEI: 176 [P<0.0001 vs PBO-only]; MEM-only: 188 [P=0.0001 vs PBO-only]; MEM+ChEI: >196 [P<0.0001 vs PBO-only]; all-PBO groups: 168; all-MEM groups: 193 [P=0.0037 vs all-PBO]), ADCS-ADL19 (PBO-only: 125; PBO+ChEI: 127 [P=0.9854 vs PBO-only]; MEM-only: 172 [P=0.0445 vs PBO-only]; MEM+ChEI: 168 [P=0.2390 vs PBO-only]; all-PBO: 127; all-MEM: 168 [P=0.0127 vs all-PBO]), NPI (PBO-only: 85; PBO+ChEI: 84 [P<0.0001 vs PBO-only]; MEM-only: 101 [P=0.3518 vs PBO-only]; MEM+ChEI: 87 [P=0.0333 vs PBO-only]; all-PBO: 85; all-MEM: 88 [P=0.0027 vs all-PBO]), and CIBIC-Plus (PBO-only: 126; PBO+ChEI: 126 [P=0.4567 vs PBO-only]; MEM-only: 168 [P=0.1429 vs PBO-only]; MEM+ChEI: 168 [P=0.4011 vs PBO-only]; all-PBO: 126; all-MEM: 168 [P=0.0205 vs all-PBO]). Conclusions: Time-to-event analyses support the conclusion that memantine alone or in combination with a ChEI is efficacious in delaying cognitive, functional, and behavioral declines in patients with moderate to severe AD.
2015 · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
Background: Optimized scales and composite outcomes have been proposed as a way to more accurately measure Alzheimer's disease related decline. AFFITOPE® AD02, is an amyloid-beta (Aβ)-targeting vaccine to elicit anti-Aβ antibodies. IMM-AD04, commonly known as Alum, originally designated as a control agent, appeared to have disease-modifying activity in a multicenter, parallel group phase II study in early AD patients. Objectives: To develop adapted outcomes for cognition, function and a composite scale with improved sensitivity to decline and treatment effects in early AD (mild plus prodromal AD) based on historical data and to assess these adapted outcomes in this phase II study. Design: Data from public datasets was analyzed using a partial least squares model in order to identify an optimally weighted cognitive outcome, Adapted ADAS-cog, and an optimally weighted ADL outcome, Adapted ADCS-ADL which were prospectively defined as co-primary endpoints for the study and were also combined into a composite scale. Data from 162 patients in the placebo groups of ADCS studies and 156 mild patients in the ADNI I study were pooled for this analysis. The Adapted ADAS-cog scale considered 13 ADAS-cog items as well as several Neuropsychological test items and CogState items, the Adapted ADCS-ADL considered all ADCS-ADL items. After the pre-specified analyses were complete, additional adapted and composite scales were investigated in a post-hoc manner. Evaluation of the adapted and composite scales was performed on Phase II trial data for AFFITOPE® AD02 (AFF006, Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT01117818) and historic data in early AD. Least square means, standard deviations, and least squares mean to standard deviation ratios were compared among adapted and composite scales and traditional scales for the 5 treatment groups in the phase II study and overall for the historic data. Treatment effect sizes and p-values were also compared for the phase II study. Results: Cognitive items that were selected for the adapted cognitive scale (aADAS-cog) and had the highest weights were Word Recall, Word Recognition, and Orientation. Delayed Word Recall and Digit Cancellation were among the items excluded due to lack of improved sensitivity to decline. Highly weighted ADL items included in the adapted functional scale (aADCS-ADL) were using the telephone, traveling, preparing a meal/snack, selecting clothing, shopping and using appliances. Excluded items were primarily basic ADLs such as eating, walking, toileting and bathing. Comparisons between traditional scales and primary outcome adapted scales show improved sensitivity to group differences with the adapted scales in the phase II trial. Most of the improvement in the sensitivity of the aADAS-cog and the aADCS-ADL is due to a larger treatment difference observed rather than the improved sensitivity to decline in the comparison groups. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively use optimized scales as primary endpoints and to demonstrate the superior power of optimized scales and composites in early disease. Although it is possible that the treatment difference between randomized groups is due to a factor other than the treatment itself, for instance baseline imbalance, the improved power to detect these differences still argues in favor of the adapted scales. The issue of oversensitivity to detect treatment effects is controlled by selection of the alpha level for significance, and in our case will happen less than 5% of the time. Clinical relevance of the treatment difference should be assessed separately from statistical significance, and in this phase II study, is supported by significant or similar sizes of effect on function, behaviour and quality of life outcomes, which are important to patients and caregivers.
2015 · Neurology
OBJECTIVE: This subset analysis assessed the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release memantine (MemER; 28 mg/day) in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) receiving donepezil, the most commonly used cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI). BACKGROUND: In a 24-week randomized trial (N=677) of patients with moderate to severe AD receiving stable ChEI therapy (donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine), MemER-treated group significantly outperformed the placebo-treated group on measures of cognition (SIB), global clinical status (CIBIC-Plus), behavior (NPI), and semantic processing ability (VFT), but not on the measure of daily functioning (ADCS-ADL19). DESIGN/METHODS: Prospectively defined assessments in the donepezil subset (MemER/Don, 232; Placebo/Don, 224) utilized the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach and an ANCOVA model (SIB, NPI, VFT, ADCS-ADL19: baseline-to-endpoint changes) or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (CIBIC-Plus; endpoint scores). Post hoc sensitivity analyses, based on the observed cases (OC), assessed (a) changes from baseline across all visits (mixed-effects model with repeated measures [MMRM]), and (b) areas under the curve (AUC, Week0-Week24; ANCOVA). Tolerability was assessed by examining treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the safety population (MemER/Don, 236; Placebo/Don, 227). RESULTS: The prospectively defined analyses revealed a significant endpoint advantage of MemER/Don over Placebo/Don on SIB (P=0.001), NPI (P=0.009), and VFT (P<0.001), but not on CIBIC Plus (P=0.165) or ADCS-ADL19 (P=0.894). The MMRM analysis demonstrated a significant advantage of MemER/Don over Placebo/Don across all visits for SIB (P<0.001), CIBIC-Plus (P=0.008), NPI (P=0.013), and VFT (P<0.001), but not for ADCS-ADL19 (P=0.606), which was corroborated by the AUC analysis (SIB, P=0.028; CIBIC-Plus, P=0.019; NPI, P=0.012; VFT, P=0.008; ADCS-ADL19, P=0.758). Overall TEAE rates were 61.9[percnt] (MemER/Don) and 59.9[percnt] (Placebo/Don). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses suggest that addition of memantine extended release to donepezil in patients with moderate to severe AD is associated with benefits across several clinical domains, with good tolerability. Study Supported by: Forest Laboratories, LLC, a subsidiary of Actavis, Inc.
2014 · PLoS One
Identifying safe and effective adjuvants is critical for the advanced development of protein-based vaccines. Pattern recognition receptor (PRR) agonists are increasingly being explored as potential adjuvants, but there is concern that the efficacy of these molecules may be dependent on potentially dangerous levels of non-specific immune activation. The filovirus virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine protects mice, guinea pigs, and nonhuman primates from viral challenge. In this study, we explored the impact of a stabilized dsRNA mimic, polyICLC, on VLP vaccination of C57BL/6 mice and Hartley guinea pigs. We show that at dose levels as low as 100 ng, the adjuvant increased the efficacy of the vaccine in mice. Antigen-specific, polyfunctional CD4 and CD8 T cell responses and antibody responses increased significantly upon inclusion of adjuvant. To determine whether the efficacy of polyICLC correlated with systemic immune activation, we examined serum cytokine levels and cellular activation in the draining lymph node. PolyICLC administration was associated with increases in TNFα, IL6, MCP1, MIP1α, KC, and MIP1β levels in the periphery and with the activation of dendritic cells (DCs), NK cells, and B cells. However, this activation resolved within 24 to 72 hours at efficacious adjuvant dose levels. These studies are the first to examine the polyICLC-induced enhancement of antigen-specific immune responses in the context of non-specific immune activation, and they provide a framework from which to consider adjuvant dose levels.
2014 · Neurology
Objective: To explore treatment effects of once-daily 28-mg extended-release memantine (MemER) over the entire course of a randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using an area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Background: Efficacy and safety of MemER were demonstrated in a 24-week RCT (N=677) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD concurrently receiving cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) therapy. Protocol-specified analyses revealed significant MemER benefits on baseline-to-endpoint changes in cognition (SIB), global clinical status (CIBIC-Plus), behavior (NPI), and semantic processing (VFT), but not on a measure of daily function (ADCS-ADL19). Methods: ANCOVA analysis was performed for each efficacy parameter and a composite Z-score of patient-level AUCs for changes from baseline across all study visits (n=540). Results: Over the entire 24-week study, MemER-ChEI AUCs for SIB, CIBIC-Plus, and NPI showed mean improvements of 88% (P=0.014), 133% (P=0.019), and 109% (P<0.001), relative to placebo-ChEI. Mean VFT AUC cumulative worsening in the placebo-ChEI group was 139% greater than the AUC improvement in the Mem-ChEI group (P=0.014). Mean ADCS-ADL19 AUC improvement in the MemER-ChEI group was 117% greater than the AUC worsening in the placebo-ChEI group (P=0.528). Other time intervals yielded similar results. In composite Z-score analysis a significant cumulative improvement of 56% across all clinical domains for MemER-ChEI vs placebo-ChEI was observed in Weeks 0-12 (P=0.053), which increased to 198% over the entire 24-week study period (P<0.001). Conclusions: In this post-hoc AUC analysis of an AD RCT, mean cumulative treatment benefits of 198% were observed across five clinical domains for memantine ER added to background ChEI therapy. This approach provides a more complete, ecologically valid, robust and dynamic representation of longitudinal efficacy than the usual baseline-to-endpoint change-score trial analyses. These results support that memantine ER add-on therapy yielded consistent, cumulative and meaningful therapeutic benefits across 24 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
2013 · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Introduction: In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), significant behavioral symptoms are associated with patient distress, caregiver burden, admission to long-term care facilities, and use of psychotropic medications. Because of safety risks involved with antipsychotic use in this patient population, evaluating the efficacy of antidementia drugs on behavioral symptoms is of great interest. A new, extended-release (ER) formulation of memantine (28 mg, once daily) has been approved in the US, based upon the results of a 24-week, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MEM-MD-50, NCT00322153) in patients with moderate to severe AD concurrently taking a cholinesterase inhibitor (placebo, n¼335; memantine, n¼342). In that trial, memantine ER treatment was associated with significant benefits compared with placebo on multiple outcome measures, including the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), a scale designed to assess behavioral symptoms in AD. Here we report results from a post hoc analysis of that trial, in which we assessed the behavioral effects memantine ER as a function of patients’ disease severity at Baseline, as determined using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Methods: Patients (observed cases; N¼540) were divided into 14 subgroups, corresponding to Baseline MMSE scores (range: 4-17). Baseline-to-Endpoint (Week 24) changes for memantine ER and placebo groups were assessed for each subgroup using a mixed-effects model with repeated measures, with the Baseline MMSE score as a linear covariate; sensitivity analyses were conducted using a quadratic model and a separate means model. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, no corrections for multiple hypothesis testing were performed. Results: At Week 24, memantine ER was associated with mean improvement on the NPI over placebo for patients with Baseline MMSE values across the full range of 4-17, with mean between-group differences ranging from 2.7 to 3.0 points. The mean differences reached significance (p<0.05) in the range of 7-14, with the analysis of the outlying score ranges being limited by small n values and low statistical power. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, 6 months of treatment with memantine ER in patients with moderate to severe AD was associated with a significant mean improvement in behavioral symptoms across a wide range of Baseline severities.
2013 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: Memantine is an NMDA receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease (AD); donepezil is a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI), approved for mild to severe AD in the US. Treatment of AD typically involves initiation of donepezil therapy in early stages, with memantine added as the disease progresses to moderate and severe stages. Two large 24-week randomized trials and several observational studies suggest that this combined treatment is superior to monotherapy with either drug; while results of one small 52-week randomized trial generated debate. To further investigate the effects of combination therapy vs monotherapy, we pooled four similarly designed randomized, placebo-controlled trials of memantine inpatients with moderate to severe AD and compared Baseline-to-Endpoint changes in measures of cognition (SIB), function (ADCS-ADL 19), behavior (NPI), and global clinical status (CIBIC-Plus), stratified by treatment/concur-rent therapy regimen (placebo, memantine, placebo/donepezil, or memantine/donepezil). Methods: All patients from two memantine monotherapy trials (MRZ-9001-9605 and MEM-MD-01; N¼567) and donepezil-treated patients from two memantine add-on trials (MEM-MD-02 and MEM-MD-50; N¼841) were pooled and Endpoint changes from Baseline for the SIB, ADCS-ADL 19, NPI, and CIBIC-Plus were assessed using a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (observed cases). Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, no corrections for multiple comparisons were performed. Results: At study Endpoint, the memantine/donepezil treatment group was significantly superior to placebo (P<0.001) and both memantine and placebo/donepezil monotherapy groups (P<0.05) on all four efficacy measures. There were no statistically significant differences between memantine and placebo/donepezil monotherapy groups on the CIBIC-plus, ADCS-ADL 19, and NPI; however, the placebo/donepezil group performed significantly better than the memantine group on the SIB (P<0.001). Both memantine and placebo/donepezil treatment groups were significantly better than placebo on the SIB, ADCS-ADL 19, and CIBIC-plus (P<0.01), but no significant treatment differences were observed among these three treatment groups on the NPI. Conclusions: This pooled analysis is in agreement with evidence suggesting that adding memantine to stable donepezil treatment in patients with moderate to severe AD is associated with improvements across several clinical domains, compared with monotherapy using either drug. Appropriately powered, long-term, prospective studies of add-on therapy in AD are warranted.
2013 · Neurology
OBJECTIVE: In this post hoc analysis of a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MEM-MD-50, NCT00322153) of extended-release (ER) memantine (28 mg, once daily) in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) concurrently taking a cholinesterase inhibitor (placebo, n=335; memantine, n=342), we assessed the behavioral effects memantine ER as a function of patients' disease severity at Baseline, as determined using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). BACKGROUND: Because of safety risks involved with antipsychotic use in patients with AD, the use of antidementia drugs to help manage behavioral symptoms is of great interest. A new memantine ER formulation has demonstrated significant benefits compared with placebo on multiple outcome measures, including the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), a scale designed to assess behavioral symptoms in AD. DESIGN/METHODS: Patients (observed cases; N=540) were divided into 14 subgroups, corresponding to Baseline MMSE scores (range: 4-17). Baseline-to-Endpoint (Week 24) changes for memantine ER and placebo groups were assessed for each subgroup using a mixed-effects model with repeated measures, with the Baseline MMSE score as a linear covariate; sensitivity analyses were conducted using a quadratic model and a separate means model. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, no corrections for multiple hypothesis testing were performed. RESULTS: At Week 24, memantine ER was associated with mean improvement on the NPI over placebo across the full Baseline MMSE range of 4-17, with statistically significant (p<0.05) differences observed in the range of 7-14; outlying score ranges were limited by small n values and low statistical power. Mean between-group differences ranged from 2.7 to 3.0 points. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis, 6 months of treatment with memantine ER in patients with moderate to severe AD was associated with significant improvement in behavioral symptoms across a wide range of Baseline severities.
2012 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background The efficacy of a new, extended-release (ER) formulation of memantine (28 mg, once daily) has been demonstrated previously in a 24-week, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (MEM-MD-50, NCT00322153; placebo, n=335; memantine, n=342) in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) concurrently taking a cholinesterase inhibitor. The current study is a post hoc analysis, designed to explore the effects of memantine ER on combinations of outcome measures utilized in that trial. Methods Efficacy outcomes included measures of cognition (SIB), function (ADCS-ADL 19), behavior (NPI), and global status (CIBIC-Plus). For each measure, two levels of response were defined: improvement or stabilization (“no decline”; baseline-to-endpoint improvement of ≥0 points for the SIB, ADCS-ADL 19, and NPI; endpoint score ≤4 for the CIBIC-Plus) and clinically notable response (baseline-to-endpoint improvement of ≥3 points for the SIB, ADCS-ADL 19, and NPI; endpoint score ≤3 for the CIBIC-Plus). The treatment groups were compared by calculating the proportions of patients who achieved no decline or a clinically notable response on any combination of 2, 3, or all 4 efficacy measures. Data were analyzed using observed cases and Wald's test (±=0.05); numbers needed to treat (NNTs) were also calculated. Due to the exploratory nature of this analysis, no corrections for multiple comparisons were performed. Results For both response levels and all outcome combinations, proportions of responders in the memantine ER group (n=266-269) exceeded those in the placebo group (n= 271-272). The difference between proportions of memantine ER- and placebo-treated patients who experienced no decline approached statistical significance for the SIB/CIBIC-Plus combination (54.6% vs 46.1%; P =0.054, NNT=12). For clinically notable responses, memantine ER was significantly superior to placebo for the 2-measure combination of ADCS-ADL 19/NPI (21.3% vs 15.8%; P =0.042, NNT=18), and the 3-measure combinations of ADCS-ADL 19/NPI/SIB (15.4% vs 9.6%; P =0.027, NNT=17), and ADCS-ADL 19/SIB/CIBIC-Plus (12.4% vs 7.4%; P =0.030, NNT=20). Conclusions This exploratory post hoc analysis suggests that, in patients with moderate to severe AD, memantine ER may provide simultaneous benefits on multiple clinical domains, especially when improvements in cognition and function are observed, and when a response to therapy is relatively strong.
2012 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: No well-established, validated endpoints exist that are sensitive to change in MCI populations in clinical trials. Our goal was to develop a tool based on standard clinical items that would demonstrate maximum responsiveness to progression and to treatment in an MCI population and would also perform well in a mild AD population (collectively referred to as Early AD). This analysis uses a novel approach by utilizing data from multiple studies to investigate responsiveness to progression and treatment effects rather than sensitivity to baseline deficits. Methods: This tool was built empirically with no a priori assumptions. A partial least squares (PLS) regression model used placebo data from 4 MCI studies over 12 months to select the combination of cognitive and functional items which is most sensitive to change over time, using items from a variety of well-established and validated scales. The PLS regression coefficients from the model were used to form a weighted composite score. The resulting composite score is comprised of ADAS-Cog, MMSE and CDR items. Performance of the composite score was assessed against the original scales in an MCI population, in enriched (CSF Aβ positive) MCI subgroups, with split sample validation, in the presence of a treatment effect and in a mild AD patient population combining data from 3 studies. Results: A composite clinical score was devised from 12 items from the ADAS-Cog, MMSE, and CDR-SB that assess both cognition and global function. This score demonstrates improved sensitivity to decline, as well as reduced heterogeneity, as compared with original scales, and is responsive to treatment effect in MCI, enriched MCI and mild AD populations. The composite score allows for substantial sample sizes reductions in non-enriched and enriched MCI populations for a 12-month study (see Figure). Conclusions: A new composite clinical score that utilizes relevant items from validated and well-established clinical tools provides a tool that can be used as a single clinical outcome in studies that target MCI, enriched MCI and mild AD populations. This tool will enable the use of substantially smaller sample sizes due to improved sensitivity to disease progression and treatment effects.
2011 · The American Journal of Human Genetics
2010 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: In patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is of interest to determine whether therapy can prevent worsening across multiple clinical domains. In a previously reported, randomized trial in moderate AD (NCT00469456), memantine was superior to placebo at improving functional communication, as recognized by caregivers. Here we focus on patients from that trial who experienced worsening on three possible outcomes: a clinician's assessment of global status (CGI-C), a measure of the patient's language and functional communication (the Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory [FLCI]), and a caregiver's assessment of the patient's functional communication skills (the combined Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs subscales of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association - Functional Assessment of Communication Skills of Adults scale [ASHA-FACS]). Methods: Native English-speaking outpatients with AD (MMSE range: 10-19) participated in a 12-week, international, double-blind, randomized study of memantine (20 mg/day; ITT n = 133) versus placebo (ITT n = 124). Concurrent cholinesterase inhibitor treatment, stable throughout the study, was permitted but not required. In this post hoc analysis (LOCF), we selected patients who experienced any decline from baseline on the three outcome measures (CGI-C >4, FLCI <0, or ASHA-FACS <0). We also examined the subsets of patients in the CGI-C >4 subset who evidenced greater-than-mild decline on the FLCI (FLCI <-3) and ASHA-FACS (ASHA-FACS <-10). We then used Generalized Estimating Equations to compare treatment groups in terms of proportions of patients who fulfilled these criteria for double and triple outcome measure combinations at endpoint and overall (i.e., throughout the trial). Results: In the three possible double-outcome measure combinations for patients experiencing any decline, memantine treatment (vs. placebo) significantly prevented worsening at endpoint and overall for the ASHA-FACS/CGI-C combination and overall for the ASHA-FACS/FLCI combination (P < 0.05). No significant differences in prevention of worsening were observed for the FLCI/CGI-C double-outcome combination or for the triple-outcome combination. In the group that experienced greater-than mild decline, all three double-outcome combinations and the triple-outcome combination demonstrated significant prevention of worsening in the memantine group at endpoint and overall (P < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with moderate AD, memantine is associated with a prevention of worsening in functional communication and global clinical status.
2010 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: In patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), a declining ability to communicate has been associated with increased caregiver stress. In a previously reported, randomized trial in moderate AD (NCT00469456), memantine was superior to placebo at improving functional communication, as recognized by caregivers. Here we focus on patients from that trial who experienced a worsening on two measures of functional communication: the primary study endpoint, an assessment of patients using the Functional Linguistic Communication Inventory (FLCI), and the secondary study endpoint, an assessment of caregivers using the combined Social Communication and Communication of Basic Needs subscales of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association - Functional Assessment of Communication Skills of Adults scale (ASHA-FACS). Methods: Native English-speaking outpatients with AD (MMSE range: 10-19) participated in a 12-week, international, double-blind, randomized study of memantine (20 mg/day; ITT n = 133) versus placebo (ITT n = 124). Concurrent cholinesterase inhibitor treatment, stable throughout the study, was permitted but not required. In this post hoc analysis (LOCF), we selected patients whose changes on the FLCI or the ASHA-FACS subscales indicated any worsening (<0, both measures), greater-than-mild worsening (decline of more than 0.5 standard deviations: FLCI, <-3; ASHA-FACS, <-10), or greater-than-moderate worsening (decline of more than 1.0 standard deviation: FLCI, <-6; ASHA-FACS, <-20). We then used Generalized Estimating Equations to compare treatment groups in terms of proportions of patients who experienced each degree of worsening at endpoint and overall (i.e., throughout the trial). Results: On the FLCI, no significant difference was observed between memantine and placebo in the proportion of patients who experienced any decline (endpoint and overall); however, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the placebo group experienced greater-than-mild worsening at endpoint (P = 0.032) and overall (P = 0.013) and greater-than-moderate worsening at endpoint (P = 0.039) but not overall (P = 0.081). On the ASHA-FACS, significantly more caregivers of patients taking placebo relative to memantine reported any worsening overall (P = 0.013) but not at endpoint (P = 0.079); significantly greater-than-mild worsening at endpoint (P = 0.012) and overall (P = 0.018), and significantly greater-than-moderate worsening at endpoint (P = 0.011), though not overall (P = 0.133). Conclusions: Memantine treatment of patients with moderate AD may be associated with a prevention of worsening in functional communication.
2010 · Alzheimer's & Dementia
Background: Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) experience a decline in language and communication skills, which contributes significantly to caregiver stress. Memantine is an NMDA receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate to severe AD. We previously reported the results of a randomized trial (MEM-MD-71; NCT00469456), which demonstrated that memantine was superior to placebo in improving functional communication in patients with moderate AD, as recognized by caregivers. This report focuses on global clinical status in patients from that trial. Methods: Native English-speaking outpatients with AD (MMSE range: 10-19) participated in a 12-week, international, double-blind, randomized study of memantine (20 mg/day; ITT n = 133) versus placebo (ITT n = 124). Concurrent cholinesterase inhibitor treatment, stable throughout the study, was permitted but not required. The primary and secondary measures were baseline-to-endpoint score changes on the FLCI and the Social Communication/Communication of Basic Needs subscales of the ASHA-FACS, which are, respectively, patient- and caregiver-based instruments designed for the assessment of functional communication abilities. An additional outcome measure was patients' global clinical status, assessed using the 7-point Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scale. The distributions of CGI-C scores (OC and LOCF) were compared between groups using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test. Post hoc analyses of the proportions of patients (OC and LOCF) who showed any improvement (CGI-C <4) at Week 12 and overall (i.e., throughout the trial) were performed using Generalized Estimating Equations. Results: CGI-C scores at study endpoint (Week 12; Mean ± SD) indicate a significantly better global clinical status of memantine-treated patients, compared to their placebo-treated counterparts (3.8 ± 1.1 vs. 4.0 ± 1.1, P = 0.03; both OC and LOCF). In addition, memantine treatment was associated with a greater proportion of patients who showed an overall improvement at Week 12 (39.1% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.07; OC and 39.1% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.06; LOCF) and overall (P = 0.045; OC and P = 0.04; LOCF). Conclusions: Memantine treatment of patients with moderate AD is associated with an improvement in patients' global clinical status.
2010 · European Neuropsychopharmacology
2007 · Patent
Abstract: In general, the invention relates to a pharmaceutical dose having R-flurbiprofen as the active ingredient that upon oral administration of a single dose to a fasting subject provides a Cmax of about 30-95 µg per mL. When the dose is administered to an individual having mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (or desiring protection against Alzheimer's disease) twice daily for at least 4 months according to the described guidelines, an improvement or lessening in decline of cognitive function as characterized by cognition tests is observed in the patient. The composition of the invention is formulated with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, salts or carriers.
Loading more publications…
Looking for older work, or a specific methodology paper? Our research team can point you to the right reference.
Ask our team
